Review the proposed change, examine its cited evidence and identify the version that reaches handoff. In clinstead designer, experts can inspect specific records of how the study was built.
Inspect the cited passage, the proposed operation and the saved review. Each answers a different question about how the design was built.
Inspect the individual operations an agent proposes: create a field, change a rule, connect a form to a visit. Refine, accept or reject those operations before they become part of the design.
Document-derived proposals can include a quoted passage and source page. Review the cited evidence alongside the proposed interpretation; source references are available for supported proposal workflows.
Recorded design actions associate the actor, action and study. Saved AI approvals retain the proposed operations, reviewer and decision time, so a later review can examine how the design developed.
Saved approval records preserve the prompt, proposal, rationale and available evidence. They support historical inspection alongside the study’s activity history. Record coverage and retention are part of the intended-use evaluation.
Compare saved study snapshots at entity level. See what was added, removed or changed across the forms, fields and relationships that make up the study.
Snapshot comparison and dependency analysis answer different questions: what changed in the saved design, and what the current structure depends on. Both give reviewers concrete information to investigate.
A compiled package identifies its source snapshot, compiler or adapter version and generated artifacts. File hashes help identify the exact files produced for a handoff.
Interpretation and compilation are separate steps. AI proposes changes to the study; the compiler translates the reviewed structure through a target adapter. A generated package still needs the receiving system’s import and study acceptance checks.
Preview forms with sample inputs. Exercise conditional visibility and calculations. Check the relationships across forms, visits and arms.
Study-wide checks can surface circular dependencies, references to data collected only at a later visit and gaps across arms. Structural checks can block compilation so the issue is addressed before a package is produced.
Explore the build and review workflowAgree which tasks the system will perform, which records it will handle and which decisions it will support. Use that scope to define requirements, assess risk and plan qualification and acceptance evidence.
GxP suitability is evaluated for the proposed use and deployment. It is not a blanket product certification.
Start with the work you have. Show us where you want to go.
